Hi, all.
On
Christmas, I received a truly fascinating book titled Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can’t Stop Talking. As the title suggests, it discusses of
introversion and life in the Extrovert Ideal of the U.S. of A. I’ll try to write a review of the book
once I’m finished; it shouldn’t take long, seeing how fast I’m consuming it.
I’m
writing this post because I just read an interesting bit about raising an
introverted child, in particular how to eke a conversation from him (or her)
after a school day. I’m sure we’ve
all experienced this: coming home after a long day, we want to curl up with a
nice book for half an hour or so, and then wham!—“How
was school today, David?”
Well,
as my parents will tell you, 99.5% of all answers to that question is “Sure, it
was fine,” or “Not much,” or something about homework. There was never a substantive
answer. There are a few reasons
for that, but the main one is that I didn’t have an answer. To adequately answer “How was school
today?” I would need to describe each class and each teacher in some detail,
which would take half an hour or more.
And let’s be honest here, it’s like asking “What was different at work
today?” Well, it’s a routine, so
95% of the time nothing differs. When asked “What happened at school
today?” a reply of “Nothing,” really means “The same routine you expect from
St. Anselm’s or the University of Chicago, nothing different enough to be worth
discussing.” I don’t want to spend
half an hour each day describing my day in detail, and in any event my parents
don’t want to listen to it every day (despite what they might think now).
It
strikes me that this is relevant beyond parental interaction. I can’t keep track of twenty people in
a room, so I either devote exorbitant amounts of time to a small group or never
connect to anyone. Thus far, I’ve
tried to contact as many people as possible, but this means that on my rare
ventures into party life, I ask broad, cookie-cutter questions that
dead-end. I always thought I was
bad at networking, but the truth is a bit more complex. Having twenty contacts at the end of
the night means nothing if I haven’t
connected with them. The key isn’t meeting as many people as possible; it’s
finding the one or two genuinely interesting people in the crowd and engaging
them in a real conversation.
The
fundamental point in both cases is focus. Both discussing my school routine every
day and “working the room” by talking to a dozen people in an hour takes a huge
amount of energy for very little reward.
I can save a lot of time and energy by answering specific questions or
focusing my efforts on the two or three most interesting people. There is some risk here, of course,
just as there’s risk in investing in only a few stocks; you either have a
massive payoff or nothing. Still,
I’ll take the risk. I can’t accept
fluff as a basis for friendship; it takes trust, and winning or giving trust
needs more than a five-minute discussion of our dogs.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey (it's Rahul)
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that talking with people in a large setting can be just incomprehensible most of the time. In fact, this past winter break, seeing friends home from school, I kept on being asked the same questions: "What's new?" "How are you doing?", and I didn't really know how to choose what was important enough to talk about.
A few years ago, a friend introduced my to this ice-breaker/greeting: "What's your 3?: Health, Emotions, School/Work" It's a nice way to focus our introductory conversation on what is often the most important parts of our life. Try this out with close friends first, as you might find it a little hard to be honest about your emotional life right off the bat. It's a nice way to fill your friends in on what's been happening in your life if you haven't seen eachother in ~a week.