Monday, January 7, 2013

Problems with Broad Communications

Hi, all.
            On Christmas, I received a truly fascinating book titled Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can’t Stop Talking.  As the title suggests, it discusses of introversion and life in the Extrovert Ideal of the U.S. of A.  I’ll try to write a review of the book once I’m finished; it shouldn’t take long, seeing how fast I’m consuming it.
            I’m writing this post because I just read an interesting bit about raising an introverted child, in particular how to eke a conversation from him (or her) after a school day.  I’m sure we’ve all experienced this: coming home after a long day, we want to curl up with a nice book for half an hour or so, and then wham!—“How was school today, David?”
            Well, as my parents will tell you, 99.5% of all answers to that question is “Sure, it was fine,” or “Not much,” or something about homework.  There was never a substantive answer.  There are a few reasons for that, but the main one is that I didn’t have an answer.  To adequately answer “How was school today?” I would need to describe each class and each teacher in some detail, which would take half an hour or more.  And let’s be honest here, it’s like asking “What was different at work today?”  Well, it’s a routine, so 95% of the time nothing differs.  When asked “What happened at school today?” a reply of “Nothing,” really means “The same routine you expect from St. Anselm’s or the University of Chicago, nothing different enough to be worth discussing.”  I don’t want to spend half an hour each day describing my day in detail, and in any event my parents don’t want to listen to it every day (despite what they might think now).
            It strikes me that this is relevant beyond parental interaction.  I can’t keep track of twenty people in a room, so I either devote exorbitant amounts of time to a small group or never connect to anyone.  Thus far, I’ve tried to contact as many people as possible, but this means that on my rare ventures into party life, I ask broad, cookie-cutter questions that dead-end.  I always thought I was bad at networking, but the truth is a bit more complex.  Having twenty contacts at the end of the night means nothing if I haven’t connected with them. The key isn’t meeting as many people as possible; it’s finding the one or two genuinely interesting people in the crowd and engaging them in a real conversation.
            The fundamental point in both cases is focus.  Both discussing my school routine every day and “working the room” by talking to a dozen people in an hour takes a huge amount of energy for very little reward.  I can save a lot of time and energy by answering specific questions or focusing my efforts on the two or three most interesting people.  There is some risk here, of course, just as there’s risk in investing in only a few stocks; you either have a massive payoff or nothing.  Still, I’ll take the risk.  I can’t accept fluff as a basis for friendship; it takes trust, and winning or giving trust needs more than a five-minute discussion of our dogs.

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey (it's Rahul)

    I agree with you that talking with people in a large setting can be just incomprehensible most of the time. In fact, this past winter break, seeing friends home from school, I kept on being asked the same questions: "What's new?" "How are you doing?", and I didn't really know how to choose what was important enough to talk about.
    A few years ago, a friend introduced my to this ice-breaker/greeting: "What's your 3?: Health, Emotions, School/Work" It's a nice way to focus our introductory conversation on what is often the most important parts of our life. Try this out with close friends first, as you might find it a little hard to be honest about your emotional life right off the bat. It's a nice way to fill your friends in on what's been happening in your life if you haven't seen eachother in ~a week.

    ReplyDelete