Employer’s Note

Dear Sir or Madam:

            I compose this note, not to make demands, but in the hopes that it will improve our soon-to-be relationship on both a working and a personal level.  My past experience states that it is best to make strategies, expectations, and methods explicit, so as to prevent any confusion or discovery of failure at a late stage in the project.  As such, I wish to make my general working tendencies and desires clear.

            The most important point: in order to perform well, I need a structure, or sense of structure, within which I am working.  In plainer English, this means that I want to have a relatively stable plan, with time set aside to study the theory, regular progress checkpoints, and clear goals embedded therein.  This gives me a clear and stable list of semi-independent goals, which allows modularization of the project, i.e., a definition of the expected inputs and outputs of each stage of the project, the development of implementation and testing strategies for each module, and clear goals after the attainment of which I can consolidate results, write reports, and determine which topics continue to confuse me.  Such a structure should ideally build communication into the broader plan in the form of regular meetings, reports, and explanations of theory and methods.  Such communication structures can assist me—or force me—to clarify questions and problems that I have not yet been able to answer, and may have difficulty vocalizing in a clear or coherent fashion.  In addition, it will force me to maintain a line of communication.

This brings us to our second point.  Unfortunately for both my prior supervisors and myself, it has always been difficult for me to judge or maintain the adequacy of my communication with my supervisors and colleagues.  This is partially a personal trait; I am introverted, very much so, and so I prefer to think over a problem alone.  However, it may be partially ascribed to a consistent shortage of self-confidence, which provokes an intense drive to prove myself worthy of trust, or capable of high performance.  This provides powerful motivation, but can also provoke self-destructive levels of independence and hesitance to ask for assistance.  High levels of stress or concentration often exacerbate these tendencies, causing me to forget or fail to devote sufficient energy to communicating in a clear or complete fashion.  Prior projects have demonstrated the severity and chronic nature of this problem, and I wish to avoid it in future ones; but it can be avoided only if both parties are aware of it, and if there is a structure in place to bring it to heel.

In addition to causing a hesitance to ask for assistance or guidance, this shortage of self-confidence can often lead to my failing to ask for references or feedback on my performance or any bad habits that may have been noted over the course of the project.  Further, it can exacerbate the previously noted communication problems by letting me convince myself that my presence is not welcome, or I will interrupt or offend a coworker or supervisor by intruding.  Although I have taken steps to address these issues, and although the shortage of confidence is not so serious as when beginning my M.Sc., it has by no means been eradicated.  As such, it bears mentioning that this can be an issue…and if I appear withdrawn, it is likely shyness and confusion rather than arrogance.

Finally, the modularization of the project also serves to enforce concentration on a single aspect of a problem at a time.  This is an aspect of my mind that bears some mention.  It is extremely difficult, and usually counterproductive, for me to attempt to work on—or even remember—more than a single problem at a given time.  As such, it is to my benefit to clarify which element of a project I am to work on in a given week and place the rest in a definite plan of attack.  This prevents the need to remember unnecessary details, and thus reduces the possibility of distraction or the forgetting of such details.

            I recognize that this may appear obvious to most experienced managers, but it has not been obvious to me.  Upon my arrival in Switzerland, I did not have a system in place, nor did I anticipate the dramatically greater freedom—and correspondingly looser control—afforded Swiss M.Sc. students.  On more than one occasion, this culture clash caused my supervisors to, as we say in the States, give me enough rope to hang myself with.  The only benefit derived from such misadventures and miscommunications has been the recognition of the need to formally define such personal management, and implement a strategy to avoid repeating such miscommunications in the future.

            After accepting this project, our first step must be to meet and open communication with all participants and advisors.  There will be no better time.  In these meetings, we must define the questions being asked, to wit, what scientific hypotheses do we have, and what engineering problems may we face?  Without these questions defined in the minds of all involved, it will be too easy to become lost.  Once these questions have been asked, then we may proceed to the remainder of the planning:

• Split the project into modules
• Theoretical basis
• Basic background
• Specific problem
• Basic method or pipeline
• Additional modules
• Define function of these modules
• Separate these modules from basic function
• Place modules in a hierarchy of priority, and begin with the most urgent
• Define an archiving system based on this hierarchy
• Separate directories for each module
• Separate directory for final script and report
• Write a report for the theoretical basis
• Break into sub-reports as appropriate by modularity
• State initial background knowledge
• Explain additional background knowledge gained in literature search
• Write a summary and a review of project-specific literature
• Note any clear questions
• Describe any points that still appear unclear or confused
• Define each module before it is begun
• Goal (singular) of phase
• Milestones
• Theoretical basis
• Foreseeable difficulties
• Outputs expected
• Tests to be run on these results
• At the end of each implemented module, write a sub-report
• Goal of module
• Purpose of module in broader project plan
• Hypotheses addressed
• Theoretical basis for this module
• Methods and reasoning behind these methods
• Milestones achieved
• Any deviations from original plan
• Outputs generated
• Results of output tests
• Location of outputs and test results in archival structure
• Discussion of results
• Conclusions
• Unresolved questions or points of confusion
• Each week, have a five-minute presentation with following discussion
• Presentation
• Structure of current module
• Place of current module in broader project
• Status of current module
• Work in past week
• Results:
• IF results are available, explain them.  What do they mean?  Are they as expected?  If so, why, and what does that imply?  If not, why not, and what does that imply?
• IF results are not available, explain why there were no results this week.  What does that imply?  Does the approach have validity?  If so, defend it.  If not, why not?
• Goals for next week
• Discussion:
• Potential meaning and implications of current status/results
• Potential problems with current approach or work
• Realism or problems with next week’s goals
• Goals of presentation and discussion
• Consider any problems or confusions that have surfaced this week
• Remember: ignorant men do not know that they are ignorant, and so cannot remedy their situation
• Discussing your approach may allow your supervisor to spot problems early
• Consider the relevance of this approach to the broader problem
• Consider what your results mean, and how that message might be consolidated.
• Prepare for module report
• IMPORTANT: presentation of results is NOT the primary concern.  Thinking and consolidating is the primary concern.

By maintaining such a structure, it will be difficult for me to, as is said, hang myself with my own rope.  Although I desire and relish the freedom implied in possessing a personal project and being allowed to implement it as I wish, I also recognize the danger of independence too quickly or too freely given.  It has happened before.  I do not wish it to happen again.

It is, I hope, clear by now that I am highly motivated but also high-stress.  This brings us to another important point: barring truly exceptional circumstances, I do not wish to work on weekends or more than 9 to 10 hours per day.  I include searching for jobs or academic posts as part of those hours.  Such a schedule is counterproductive.  In order to provide top-quality work during the workday, I must rest, exercise, see friends, pursue relationships, and obtain mental space with which to examine strategies with a critical eye.  To ignore these needs, to attempt to be on at all times, in my experience rapidly leads to burnout; and although it is possible for a short time, such times frequently end with collapse.

Another point that bears mention—and do try to understand this, for it is important—I am not a naturally expressive person.  I am not what might, in the U.S., be described as a “people person”—that is, the sort who makes friends easily, who picks up cues easily, or who can sense and manipulate the energy in a room.  Often I am afraid of giving offence or placing myself where I am not wanted, and in such scenarios my natural reaction is silence.  This is one reason I wish to have our reports be structured and predictable; if we are forced to rely on intuition or impressions in order to communicate, the question is not if there will be a breakdown, but when.

For precisely this reason, I wish to—indeed, need to—feel included in the workplace.  Given the temporary nature of most of my projects thus far, it has not been easy to fully assimilate into my prior laboratories, and often I felt that I was missing the social life of the office.  It should not be understood that I wish to treat the laboratory as only a workplace; knowing colleagues as friends as well as coworkers is extremely important, and as such I do wish to participate in laboratory activities and social gatherings.  However, it may be difficult for me to ask for invitations to such events, due to the concerns expressed previously.  As such, if there is a social list or another method by which lab members announce events or gatherings, I wish to be part of it, and I would like to know of any events in which I would be welcome.  As noted before, my working mode is intense, but it is not all facets of my personality; I would like to demonstrate the others.

Finally, I will almost certainly want a reference at the end of this project.  Obvious?  Perhaps, but asking for such a reference has always felt somewhat mercenary to me.  My family has more in common with WASP society than we might like to admit; we do not to talk about money, we simply have it.  Experience and references are not so different.  Yet I will want, and need, a reference at the end of this project, and so it must be said.

I recognize that this may seem impertinent from a new hire.  However, my experience states that this is how large projects should be approached.  To simply cut a young worker loose is too often to lose him or her in a failure of discipline that he or she does not realize is needed; to dictate his every step is micromanagment, which is always resented and prevents meaningful growth.  A middle ground must be laid; a structure must be established and revisited regularly.  Without such a structure, it is too easy to become lost in the details, to hurtle onwards without checking our direction.  We must maintain a hierarchy of ideas, cut the branches one by one, and maintain discipline in doing so.  The lack of any one of these three things can easily lead a project to failure; and such failures have been only narrowly averted in the past.

The Clock

I have a clock in my head.  It never stops running.  It’s always there, in the back of my mind, ticking away the days, hours, minutes, seconds, with a list of tasks next to it.

I want to turn the damn thing off.

On any given day, I juggle a dozen small emergencies.  My project refuses to function; my room has a blown fuse; my report hasn’t been started; I should exercise; I need to make dinner; my medical claim needs filing; I received an official notice on Tuesday; I want to set up a date; I need to do laundry; my applications and requests for interviews remain amorphous and unwritten; I need to discuss travel plans; I need to pay attention to the lecture that is occurring right under my nose; I should play with this scientific problem that interests me; I’m running low on coffee and garlic; yesterday’s lecture needs reviewing; I have a presentation to write.  All of this runs through my brain within thirty minutes of leaving bed.

The clock ticks.

My first thought is, “How can I manage all of these tasks today?  How to schedule them so that I can stay on top of these issues?”  So I develop a plan; if I leave the house on time; if I finish such-and-such a task by 14:00; if I exercise at 18:00; etc., etc., etc.  It is all doable…if nothing goes wrong.

Of course something does not go as planned.  A task takes longer than I expected; the fix I tried doesn’t work; a friend whom I haven’t seen for a while wants to meet for dinner or coffee.

The clock ticks red.  The list remains unfinished.  I reschedule.  If I cut down on exercise; if I cook tomorrow instead of tonight; if I put off folding laundry; if the report waits another day; if the scientific curiosity waits another week; if I skip lecture review; if I sleep six hours instead of eight….

The clock ticks red.  I go to bed.  Half a dozen tasks remain.  Upon waking the next morning, I remember them; I failed to complete them yesterday; I must fit them into today’s schedule.

The clock ticks red.  I forgot to set up the date.  Travel plans remain unknown.  Applications remain unwritten.  My shirts live in my suitcase.  The emails have been waiting four days.  I haven’t exercised in seven.  The curiosity is dead.  The project isn’t working.  My report isn’t started.  And more things come.

The clock ticks red.  I want a chance to organise all of the things I haven’t done, develop a plan for how to catch up on them, and finish them.  I want time to think, rather than running from post to post.  I want to go to bed feeling like I’ve finished everything I needed to do that day.  I want to have the sense of crisis be an exception, not a rule.  I can’t remember the last time I felt like I was on time, in control; I panic at unexpected trouble.

The clock ticks red.  I don’t think I’ll ever have time to finish all my emergencies, let alone the unnecessary but interesting tasks.  I’m no longer trying to engage in preventative actions; I’m no longer even trying to eliminate the backlog; I’m just trying for damage control.

The clock ticks red.  I’ve given up.  I’ve been behind too long; there are too many things to do; I can’t remember them all; I will never be able to catch up.  I don’t care.  I don’t care that I don’t care.

The clock ticks red.

All Reset.

The clock ticks black.  I eliminated or delayed all of my less-than-urgent tasks.  I’m on top of things again.  For now.

But they are still there.  Still waiting.  I’ve not beaten the beast, just delayed its reemergence.  It will be back.  Perhaps next time, I’ll be better able to fight it.

Perhaps not.

The clock ticks black.

The clock ticks red.

Two of the tasks I delayed are due in eight days.  I haven’t looked at them.  I haven’t had time to look at them.  I don’t know how I’ll finish them both in eight days.  I know I’ll need at least twice that long to do both competently.  I should have started working on them last week.  But last week I was dealing with last week’s emergency; I didn’t remember these.

The clock ticks red.  I know I need to start addressing the tasks that are due next week.  I know that if I don’t start them now, I won’t have time to do them well, if at all.  But where is the damned time?  My current crisis requires all the energy I can spare.

The clock ticks red.  I don’t remember anything of what I heard or did yesterday.  I haven’t had time to review that material, I didn’t even have time to let it sink into my brain; I was too busy trying to finish yesterday’s emergency.  It’s okay.  I don’t need to remember it.  Yet.

The clock ticks red.  I’m eating my seed grain and I know it.  I can’t sustain this.  But it doesn’t matter; I need to survive the current crisis.  Maybe then I’ll be able to survive the next one.  And the next one.  And the next one.  The crises never stop coming.  Maybe if they did, I’d have time to come up with a plan to deal with them in an organised fashion.  But they don’t.

The clock ticks red.  I want to hit someone, to break something, but there is no one within reach who deserves it, nothing that I can break without repercussions.  I want to scream, but my roommates or colleagues will hear.  I want to cry, but somewhere along the path of “growing up”, I forgot how to.  I want to speak to someone, but I’m afraid that it will frighten them; or, worse, they will dismiss it as minor, a weakness, a lack of focus or motivation.  I should ask for help, but somehow, I can't bring myself to admit that weakness...that inadequacy.  So I can only curse myself for failing to recognise this danger sooner, and for building my protections so well.

The clock ticks red.  I open a beer at my desk.  It will calm the nerves for an hour; enough to cram the next chapter, enough to let me write the next paragraph.  In the long term, it’s unsustainable, indeed antiproductive, and I know it.  But I’m not thinking long term.  To think long term is a luxury that I cannot afford.  I’m just surviving the emergencies as they come, running in the hopes of reaching something better.  Never mind that I don’t know where the road goes.  I don’t have time to worry about that.

The clock ticks red.  I can't remember the last time I wasn't in crisis mode.  Some people find that energizing.  I passed that point long ago.  I'm just exhausted.  I'm facing the biggest crisis of this project, but my adrenaline was used up long ago.  I don't care.  I don't care that I don't care.

The clock ticks red.

Cold Returns

            There were tracks in the snow, tracks of boots and shoes and cycles and most likely a dog.  He had a bicycle, but the snow was treacherous with narrow tires and a heavy load, so he walked.  The snow still fell, finer, sharper, but he was near shelter and he walked on.

            It was cold, and damp, and he was not dressed for such weather, but he did not mind.  He thought of the great vat of wine waiting for him, and his mouth twitched in the bare suggestion of a smile.  Glühwein tonight, so he walked on.

The snow squeaked under his shoes and rattled on his cap, and he could see the bend in the tracks that signaled he was close.  He thought of home, how it, too, might be seeing snow.  But which home, the place he was born or the place where he first lived alone, first learned friendship?  Quite likely both.

He walked on.  The snow fell into the gap between pant cuff and shoe and he felt the cold in his ankle and his fingers and his eyes.  He recalled his friends and family from home, some more than others; and his chest tightened at the memory of the one whom he had hoped would be more than friend.  Enough, he told himself: that choice has been made, that ship has sailed.  Ah, but if you heard it might return to port, you’d run to it.  Aye, but there’s no knowing if or when that ship will return, so dwelling on it serves no purpose.

            He walked on.  He had reached the turn in the tracks and he gripped the bicycle to mount the curb.  The bushes were stark and bare under their coat of snow and he thought them beautiful.  Why it was beautiful he could not say, but it was and he loved it and he wondered why.

            He walked on.

            Cold and tired and alone, he walked on.

On OCD: March 2014

I had an obsessive-compulsive episode one week ago tonight, on March 6th, C.E. 2014.

I didn’t recognize it at first; I thought it was just another day of modest self-disappointment caused by lack of focus and over-scheduling.  Those days happen, and usually an hour or two of good focused exercise is enough to bring me back to my senses.

Not that day.  That day, I couldn’t get my failure to finish the day’s self-imposed job training assignment out of my mind.  It kept buzzing in my head through the late afternoon; it kept muttering during taekwondo class; it sent my brain spinning after practice.  It felt like my brain was going round and round and round and round, racing down a spiral stair, chasing after that one detail that I had failed, I had not done my job, and now I was risking the loss of a place to live and work—all this despite the fact that my deadline was almost entirely self-imposed.  It was so bad, I left my taekwondo studio nearly half an hour early despite having my black belt test two days later.

It wasn’t until I was leaving Yong Studios, around 19:55 at night, that I realized: I know this feeling.  I experienced it on a regular basis between the ages of four and ten.  This is the feeling of an obsession, and it was driving me toward a compulsion: namely, the compulsion to complete some part of the work I had failed to do earlier.  In a very real sense, once I got home, I would be obsessively-compulsively working.

It’s hard to explain this to one who hasn’t experienced it.  The running torture is a good analogy; it is a torture where the accused is made to run around a track without food, water, or rest until he or she either confesses or collapses.  It is an insidious thing, because it does not seem like torture; there is no rack, no whip, no thumbscrew, only the repetitive, exhausting pounding.

An obsessive attack is like that: the brain runs itself in the same circle, around and around that focus point, over and over and over and over and over and over and over until the afflicted either surrenders to the compulsion or collapses from the effort of fighting.  It makes no difference that the victim knows his obsession is unrealistic; the brain has its track, and the mind runs its course.

Terror.

That’s the best description I can give for my reaction.  I’ve known my whole life that I suffered from OCD and that I am a high-strung person, but for years I believed that I finally had the demon beaten.  For some of them, perhaps I did.  Now I face the very real possibility that, rather than defeat the demon, I have simply redirected it; and that is a terrifying thought.

There are some advantages, I suppose.  If nothing else, it provides a powerful motivation to meet my responsibilities.  My brain, quite literally, will not allow me to escape those tasks I (it?) deems important.  My job, hobbies, and friends need never fear neglect.

Yet there is a danger, and a very real one at that.  To begin, my motivation is almost all negative; I work because I flog myself, not because I seek the result.  More important, this represents a loss of autonomy.  I cannot change my path at will, nor can I escape my past plans, even when those plans prove impossible.  Flexibility is almost impossible, for how can I be flexible when my mind flagellates itself for even the slightest deviation from my plans?

The only solution I’ve found, thus far, is to categorize.  Only when I dissect and outline and factualize, apart from any and all emotional baggage, do I feel able to grasp the issue without panic.  Yet it seems I must go through the panic before undergoing the divorce, and any deviation requires some excuse.

It works.  I can survive this way.  But I do not want to spend the next ten years at war, dissecting all details, excusing each deviation, analyzing every choice.  It is a stiff life that leaves, inflexible, cold.  It would make Kant proud, I suppose: he and I would have got along splendidly.  But that is not the life I want.  I want to live, to laugh, to love, to cry, to grieve.  I want to skip my workout without feeling an urge to skip bread at dinner, I want to leave work early when the doctor calls, I want to take the time to meet a friend or colleague or lover in the cafe without analyzing how it might affect my night.  I want to live, not plan to live.  I have made great strides towards that goal in the past four years, yet this last episode, and the week following it, showed how far I have yet to go.

Walking a Wire: Mental Health & Employment Edition

Hey, all.
    As many of you know, I have spent much of the past few months looking for neuroscience and psychiatric research work, both through assistantships and graduate school.  I’m currently waiting to hear from a number of places and emailing PIs in these fields.
    In explaining why I wish to pursue neuroscience, personal history invariably arises.  And thus arises the tricky part, because I can’t explain why I want to pursue neuroscience without bringing family into the problem.
    I’ve made no secret of the fact that I have anxiety issues.  As a young child—six or so—I suffered obsessive-compulsive disorder so severe that my parents had to take me out of school.  I still remember those little white SSRI pills, and the compulsion to clean.  My problems are less OCD now, and more social anxiety; I constantly feel a need to prove that I am “good enough,” and measure myself against the people I respect most (who, inevitably, are the people who are most productive or most successful while still remaining satisfied with their lives).  Nor am I the only one in my family: my uncle has OCD (he won’t see a psychiatrist, but the entire family knows he has it), at least two cousins have suffered anorexia, my brother had mild OCD, and my sister had anorexia nervosa so severe that, for three months, the sight of a full plate caused panic attacks.  With the exception of my uncle (who, as I said, refuses to seek treatment), all have recovered; still, my experience, and the experience of my family, is what sparked and continues to motivate my interest in psychiatry.

    Almost all employers and schools want to know why its interviewees want a position.  When looking at psychiatric research, I need to mention this history if I am to answer honestly.  Yet, mentioning a familial or personal history of anxiety is usually the kiss of death in an interview; so I must dissemble or obfuscate if I wish to answer at all.
    I understand why employers and schools do this.  Taking on a student or employee with a health history, particularly one as unpredictable and poorly understood as a neuropsychiatric problem, is a tremendous risk.  Yet, from my perspective, it feels like I must hide my motives in order to even have a chance of pursuing my goals.
    Personally, I see my anxiety as a mixed bag.  Certainly, it means that I build a shell in social environments and have a very difficult time opening to others; certainly, it means that I’m sensitive to insult and hostility; certainly, it affects my ability to multitask, since I feel a need to finish one task before starting another (or at least meet benchmarks in it); certainly, it’s caused tunnel vision in the past (I’m trying to avoid that in future); and, beyond doubt, it causes suffering and health problems in the afflicted (me).  Yet, it has benefits as well.  I may have difficulty multitasking, but when I set my mind to a project, I focus laser-like on the problem.  The fact that I need to “prove myself” makes me seek constant improvement, and drives me to produce high-quality work.  That I can focus on a task to the exclusion of all else means that the task gets done, and fear of being caught flat-footed means I don’t half-ass work or bullshit my way through meetings; I don’t speak unless I have something to say.  The need for benchmarks keeps me scheduled, keeps me moving, and keeps me motivated.  And the drive to improve, to prove myself capable, to, in the words of Darwin Smith, “never stop trying to be qualified for the job,” means that I reflect on my actions and think about how to avoid repeating past mistakes.  I wish all this didn’t come with anxiety and shyness, but that is part of the package.

    You can’t understand me without knowing that I am anxious.  It’s part and parcel of who I am.  I want to be honest about it.  I don’t want to hide it; I don’t want to be judged by it.  I want to show that it can be controlled, it can be tamed, and it can be used.

From the Outside Looking In

Yo.

When I write on this blog, I tend to write on issues that concern me.  That usually means that a lot of people have strong opinions on the subject.  Further, the issues are often rather thorny, so that raises its own dangers.

Something to remember when reading is, I claim no monopoly on truth or knowledge.  When I write on Islam (I’ve finished A Dream of Red Mansions, and the Qu’ran is next), I will be writing as a lapsed Catholic/not-quite-agnostic with an interest in the subject and a few Muslim friends, not as someone with years of cultural and intellectual immersion.  When I write on feminist issues or gender roles, I write as a young man from a fairly WASPy background (I was raised Catholic, but still), not as a person with a gender studies or heavily feminist background.  When I write on science or engineering or history, I write with an eye more aimed at science than at political correctness.

The inevitable result of this is that I will express some opinions that they may be inaccurate, that may be objectionable, that may be naive or blunt.  Sometimes, this is deliberate; there is value in prodding the sacred cows every so often.  Sometimes it’s unavoidable; many of the subjects that interest me are contentious at best.  Often, however, it’s the simple ignorance of an outsider.  The best cure for ignorance is education, so before jumping all over that ignorance, we should try to correct it.  This applies to opinions everywhere, not just me (although, if the person displays stupidity and bigotry as well as ignorance, that's a different story).

The point I’m trying to make is, these posts are as much for my education as for my self-expression.  I’m still learning.  If something bothers you, let me know; if I’ve made an inaccurate claim, please correct me; just don’t treat it as a manifesto.  At this stage of my life, my views are hardly set in stone.

Fat-Shaming vs. Health

Hi, all.

Now that application season #1 is (finally) over, I can return to the blog, my taekwondo studio, and hilarious things on the interwebs.  Here, I relate thoughts on a (rather inebriated) conversation at the Thanksgiving table.

Fat-shaming has been getting a lot of attention in the past few years, thanks to a disturbing prevalence of eating disorders and the pejorative use of the word “fat.”  Here, I relate my feelings on the subject.  Bear in mind that it applies to men and women equally.

It seems that in many circles, discussing one’s body shape has become an utterly taboo subject.  There are reasons for this, of course; eating disorders are an all-too-real concern, and despite what advertising would have us believe, healthy body types come in many shapes and sizes.  Fitness should be a personal decision, and we cannot fit all body types into a single mold.

Nonetheless, the rendering of fitness as a completely taboo subject worries me.  The simple fact is that, as a society, we are overweight.  I use the royal we, of course; I suspect that most of the people reading this are perfectly healthy.  However, my social circle is very much an intellectual elite; we went to college, most of us will go to graduate school, we pay attention to events in the wider world, and we have been raised to consider our health and fitness.  But, despite the jokes, statistics don’t lie: some 67% of the United States population is clinically overweight, and around 30% is obese.

Now, it’s popular to blame large corporations, poverty, lack of education, metabolic differences, the loss of time, and any of a dozen other things for this.  Those are all factors, and they should be addressed.  Nonetheless, in many (not all, but many) cases it is a lifestyle choice.  Options for healthy living are available, particularly in urban areas; the spread of healthy food and active lifestyles has been slow but real.  It’s a question of using them.

Now, here’s the bit that concerns me.  In the United States—and, I can only assume, many other Western nations as well—discussing personal fitness is something of a taboo subject.  We’re afraid of offending someone by noting an extra few pounds, and we’re afraid of triggering an eating disorder in “fragile” people.  Some have gone so far as to make overweight “normal,” or beautify it, or make it positive.  That concerns me.  It’s one thing to oppose using “fat” as an insult; it’s quite another thing to make it positive.  The science linking weight with a host of health problems is long, detailed, and damn near ironclad.  When we have a 60% overweight population, “fat” should not be positive; it should be a description of a solvable problem.

I feel that I’m trying to pull off a rather delicate balancing act here.  It’s vital to note that there’s a huge range of healthy body types; I’ve met attractive people who were stick-thin, voluptuous, and everything in between.  Anyone within the “normal” BMI range is almost certainly healthy and has nothing to worry about (yes, I know that BMI is imperfect, but it’s a start).  We can’t all look like supermodels; frankly, many supermodels shouldn’t look like supermodels.  And, as many people note, there are more important things than having a perfect body; a career path, healthy friendships, and a social life come to mind.  

I think an honest discussion of the problem, along with supportive suggestions, might be a good start.  It might help address the obesity epidemic if the sufferers were told of their affliction.  Aristotle once said that ignorance is the worst disease, because the afflicted does not know of the affliction.  To get to that point, however, will require some delicate maneuvers.

First of all, I don’t like the use of “fat” as an insult.  It’s a physical problem, not a mental one.  Like most problems, it can be fixed with dedication and hard work, and there are no shortcuts.  So one step would be to stop the use of “fat” as an insult, and use it instead more like a diagnosis.  If you think that’s impossible, well, cancer and AIDS used to carry stigmas.

This might might help the other end of the spectrum as well.  The use of “fat” as an insult has led to the assumption that “non-fat” is a good; saying “You’re looking skinny” is automatically considered a complement.  This is not always the case; I’ve seen a number of people where my immediate reaction was, “Someone needs to tell them to put on a pound or ten.”  Frankly, I think we should be more willing to say “You’re skinny; are you eating enough?”

I should clarify that, to my mind, thin is a body type: the flesh is sparse, but proportionally distributed on the frame and, well, healthy-looking.  Several boys and girls I know have been thin as long as I’ve known them, and they’re all healthy individuals.  Skinny, on the other hand, suggests that there’s not enough flesh to cover the frame.  I’ve seen people like that as well, and being ten pounds shy is at least as unattractive as being ten pounds generous.

I guess what I’m saying is to have an honest discussion about weight and healthy eating.  Being overweight is not something to be proud of or to glorify, but neither is being unnaturally thin.  Too many calories are bad, but so is too few, and so is the wrong kind.  Personally, my extended family comes in all shapes and sizes, but the healthiest tend to follow the Michael Pollan food rules: Eat food.  Not too much.  Mostly plants.

Final note: I understand why billboard supermodels are taken as “standards of beauty.”  They’re perfect.  So perfect, in fact, that I can’t find anything to like in them.

That last sentence may sound strange, but the fact is I do not find advertising models attractive.  They look like statues or gods, not humans; they radiate haughty detachment, not welcome.  I have no desire to befriend or love a statue.  Imperfections, to me, are a door; they make a person approachable.  Flaws make character, and character counts for more than perfection.  I wonder how many others feel the same.